Your view,U.S. pullout

[jock4419]

Most people 'want Iraq pull-out' 
 
Many people believe the US will stay in Iraq permanently
Most people across the world believe US-led forces should withdraw from Iraq within a year, a BBC poll suggests.
Some 39% of people in 22 countries said troops should leave now, and 28% backed a gradual pull-out. Just 23% wanted them to stay until Iraq was safe.

In the US, one-in-four supported an immediate withdrawal, while 32% wanted Iraq's security issues to be resolved before bringing the troops home.

The BBC World Service commissioned the survey of 23,193 people.


 


See statistics breakdown 
In the survey, people were asked whether coalition troops should pull out of Iraq immediately, commit to a gradual withdrawal over a year, or leave when the security situation improves.

In 19 countries, the majority of those questioned believed troops should be withdrawn either immediately or within a year.

Just three countries - Kenya, the Philippines and India - did not have an overall majority favouring withdrawal within a year.

Large numbers of people questioned in India (36%) declined to comment or said they "didn't know".

Muslim countries including Indonesia (65%), Turkey (64%) and Egypt (58%) were among those most eager for troops to be withdrawn immediately.

But an immediate pull-out was much less popular in Australia (22%), the US (24%) and UK (27%) - the countries with most troops deployed in Iraq.

Troop cuts

The top US commander in Iraq, General David Petraeus, is considering withdrawing about 4,000 troops starting in January, media reports say.

 POLL FINDINGS IN FULL


BBC World Service poll[279KB]
Most computers will open this document automatically, but you may need Adobe Reader
Download the reader here
The pull-out of one brigade would only take place if it did not threaten "recent gains" made by US forces following the troop surge that was completed in June, the New York Times reports, quoting senior US government and military officials.

Officials say Gen Petraeus will discuss possible further troop cuts to be made in 2008, when he presents his assessment of US military strategy in Iraq to Congress next week.

There are a record 168,000 US troops in Iraq, including 30,000 additional soldiers deployed as part of the "surge".

The US completed the introduction of 30,000 more troops in Iraq in mid-June.

'Permanent presence'

An Iraqi minister said the most vital need is help from Iraq's neighbours.

"Getting out of Iraq now probably the situation will be worsened; but, if our neighbouring countries ceased involving themselves in Iraq, probably the situation will be improved definitely," Education Minister Abid Dhyab al-Ajili told the BBC.

"So it depends on our neighbouring countries. Definitely I feel, if the American troops pulled out of Iraq, I think the situation will be improved in the long term."

In recent days, leaders from the US, Australia and the UK have said troops must stay in Iraq until the country is safe.

All three countries say they have a commitment to the Iraqi people to remain there until local forces are able to ensure their security.

But Doug Miller of Globescan, which carried out the research, said the results of the survey showed "the weight of global public opinion" was against them.

The respondents were also asked whether they believed the US would leave a permanent military presence in Iraq.

Half of those questioned believed the US would have bases in Iraq permanently, while 36% assumed all troops would withdraw once Iraq was stabilised.

The findings suggest support for keeping foreign troops in Iraq until security has improved has fallen significantly since an earlier World Service poll released in February 2006.

The BBC's world affairs correspondent, Nick Childs, says it is not surprising, more than four years on from a controversial invasion, that international public opinion on the foreign troop presence should now be so negative.

He added that the Bush administration has been battling perceptions that its aim has been to establish a permanent military presence in Iraq as part of a regional strategy - something it has denied.
Source;BBC



 

[sniper]

It is not suprising to see the reaction of the Muslim countries,
And it is obvious that other European countries are prepared to pull out (Dutch) immeaditly.

The gradual pullout/handover method as being used by the Brits is in my opinion the workable strategy....bearing in mind the Americans have a huge commitment, and so will always be more reluctant to bow out.  And whatever the Yanks do Australia will be 3 paces behind.   Sniper

[kiwi]

I don't think they will stay forever in Iraq, theres no real need for that. Yes they are there for maybe up to another 10 years, but in all fairness they have little to gain from it.

I am currently more interested in the New Zealand US ties. Where New Zealand is put in this, because Australia is very much used by America as extra muslce, where New Zealand its more knowledge and skill set.

There are no huge plans to rebuild Iraq, doesn't that strike people as strange?

[sniper]

Can one regain their virginity?

Na the same applies here......why build it when you know its going to go down again.

[kiwi]

Because thats what we do

[Observer_1938]

Any reduction in force capability should be gradual and well planned............it makes very little strategic sense to create an immediate vacuum....................otherwise the sacrifice of all those who lost their lives or were wounded would have been in vain..............and that does not even take into account all those who have;or will have an emotional/psychological problem in later life as a result of their deployment.

The only winners will be the 'Pollies" and the political parties.........the services wil just suffer.........."As Usual"

[kiwi]

When have they ever worried about the welfare of the troops?

[jock4419]

Goverments never worry on the welfare of their military forces,As long as the troops do their job,and sadly pay the ultimate price in the loss of their lives